Microblog
in reply to @ 2016-138.990ZI use Vitelity to give me a direct SMS -> XMPP hookup
in reply to @ 2016-138.521ZWon't a data with a single, strict field behave the same?
in reply to @ 2016-138.519ZA data with one constructor that takes on strict argument could be optimised in this wauy (I think). Otherwise the "optimisations" would add strictness where the programmer didn't expect it.
in reply to @ 2016-138.516ZRust is not really a high-level language, though. I'm not sure a comparison would be fair. I love rust, for systems and other low-level stuff, but Haskell remains my go-to for quickly banging out apps
in reply to @ 2016-137.635ZSo much stuff getting added to base.
in reply to @ 2016-137.508Zsigh
in reply to @ 2016-136.879ZLooks like you want at least mkDuplexFileHandle, not sure if there's an IODevice you could use
in reply to @ 2016-136.828Zetnaviv-compatible stuff?
But I do realise it's (very, very) hard
in reply to @ 2016-134.855ZI would use Frege if I needed to be on the JVM for some reason, but usually I don't.
in reply to @ 2016-133.476ZWorked for me for Flash (removed flash and flash clones from my system going on 8 years now, no regrets)
in reply to @ 2016-133.098ZI'm pretty sure you'll be able to just uninstall the Adobe blob (there isn't even going to be one for Linux AFAIK) and then EME won't work
in reply to @ 2016-130.945ZI didn't know that this extended beyond the Met. Very cool.
in reply to @ 2016-130.941ZMostly modifying things like the Firefox addon panel and documentation files that "advertise proprietary software", I think
in reply to @ 2016-130.637ZgNewSense unfortunately only just started work on the lastes (year old) debian stable. I'm hoping the system gets standardised and documented so that more people can help and it can stay a bit more up-to-date.
For now, Trisquel is pretty good.
in reply to @ 2016-130.530ZIf only any phone's WiFi was supported…
in reply to @ 2016-127.663ZYeah, Jingle Voice/Video works well for 1:1. Jitsi extends it to work for multiparty also
in reply to @ 2016-127.661ZThere are so many of them. The biggest issue is fragmentation, not lack of existence.
in reply to @ 2016-126.320ZDoesn't prevent sniffing at non-wifi nodes (that is: the whole rest of the Internet) so the traffic (if not end-to-end protected) is still visible to anyone putting in a little effort.
in reply to @ 2016-125.702ZIt will still pass through many Internet nodes unprotected
in reply to @ 2016-125.240ZNot sure why they want to encrypt the mesh… it's unencrypted on the Internet. Need to use end-to-end anyway.
in reply to @ 2016-125.239ZWhat kind of hurt could even happen? More effective competition (very unlikely) seems like the only theoretical way, even.
in reply to @ 2016-122.444ZIME, power users have deeper-entrenched workflows and more specialised software, which can make the transition more complex (more stuff to change or replace)