Microblog
in reply to @ 2016-073.116ZShould be in your tray. Try installing stalonetray
in reply to @ 2016-072.525ZYou realise software freedom is a social justice movement, yes?
in reply to @ 2016-072.524ZMany of the items on the list are not particularly actionable
in reply to @ 2016-071.843Zlots. Drupal, WordPress, MoinMoin, depends on what your needs are
in reply to @ 2016-071.840Zit's automated. If enough people want it offering multiple qualities could matter, but people mostly seem to want HD even on mobile these days, and the files aren't that big (unless you have all of them)
in reply to @ 2016-071.543ZOne of the many things made possible by the license change/clarification.
If you can help seed, that would be great!
in reply to @ 2016-069.844ZYeah, this statement is specifically for the vlogging channel.
in reply to @ 2016-069.136ZThanks! You guys are awesome 🙂
in reply to @ 2016-068.938ZEmail sent
in reply to @ 2016-068.936ZI'm certainly a big fan of the license change. I'm just curious about the specifics in this case.
in reply to @ 2016-068.789ZNo, I mean that the video metadata says:
Licence Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)
in reply to @ 2016-068.558ZWhy do kids at the school have root?
in reply to @ 2016-068.554ZThe individual download links at the bottom of the page are broken.
Also, I think the individual page PDFs should have the license and attribution on a corner. Would make it easier to print and distribute single pages and comply with the license.
in reply to @ 2016-068.106ZAwesome! This is very important.
in reply to @ 2016-068.095ZWhat's the correct forum to submit a question for them there?
in reply to @ 2016-068.095ZIf you look at september, older videos are marked "standard YouTube license"
in reply to @ 2016-067.900Zsources: https://github.com/cheat-engine/cheat-engine — but I don't see a license
in reply to @ 2016-067.518ZI wish the new tab ads thing had worked out. It was a good idea
in reply to @ 2016-067.513ZLXDE
in reply to @ 2016-067.192ZCC doesn't have a license that allows public performance but bans recording.
If you're mostly looking to prevent exploitation by big corporations, CC-BY-SA has a history of being successful in that regard.
in reply to @ 2016-065.568ZWhat would be the perks from such a campaign? If you really can get the views maybe see this an an investment and just go for it yourself?
in reply to @ 2016-065.193Z
read
?
in reply to @ 2016-064.566ZI didn't realise stretch was so soon
in reply to @ 2016-064.190ZThe vast majority of v6 installs should never need DHCPv6 because of the ip autoconfigure built into IPv6 that is way more effective
in reply to @ 2016-063.509ZThe movement is suprisingly organized compared to some other (such as free culture). It has key rally points, goals, projects, news sources.
What you really seem to be asking is "why doesn't this one piece of hardware work". Well, to solve that we would need to make our own hardware. See: ZaReason, Thinkpenguin for the attempts to collab with existing hardware makers: Novena, EOMA for attempts to do it again from (mostly) scratch
in reply to @ 2016-063.505ZOf course you can sell it, there's no question there.
The question of if the code is derivative of the models is an interesting one. I would expect probably not, but IANAL and you might want to consult with one (or the original creator) if you're worried.
in reply to @ 2016-062.934ZIt has not come out. Still in alpha and probably will be for years yet
in reply to @ 2016-062.099ZAnother option similar to the existential hack: Data.Dynamic
in reply to @ 2016-062.091ZEven when the book came out, remix was pretty common (though not so common as now). The issue was and is that so much of this remix is "illegal art".
We need new life in the movement to promote the commons for our future.
in reply to @ 2016-062.090ZAt least the software freedom community has a decent understanding of the issues with patents.
in reply to @ 2016-061.945ZFree Culture mostly fails to even have a rally point these days. It's hard to introduce people because the movement is so fragmented/distributed. Besides this subreddit, where do you go to get news about free culture happenings?
in reply to @ 2016-061.760ZSo, pubsub nodes cannot be set to persist with prosody yet? Do you know if that's being worked on?
in reply to @ 2016-059.555ZThe BSDs who hate copyleft still dislike CDDL. Also, could dual-license, don't have to change the license
in reply to @ 2016-059.538ZAnyone issuing such an explanation would be helping the conversation. Doesn't matter if the person saying the correct thing is "good" or "evil" — if M$ said the same thing, they'd still be right.
In fact, if Oracle starts saying these things, life will get very interesting.
in reply to @ 2016-059.186ZConservancy enforcement activity almost never ends up as a lawsuit. Lawsuits are expensive and don't serve the goals conservancy has in an enforcement (education and compliance)
in reply to @ 2016-059.186ZThat's not a claim about what distros are "really" free, but a simple, factual explanation of an infringement case they (and everyone) have been getting a lot of questions about.
in reply to @ 2016-059.130ZI think you're maybe confusing them with FSF?
in reply to @ 2016-058.907ZSounds like you would not be allowed to port, post, or otherwise modify or distribute this code. It is not open source
in reply to @ 2016-057.888ZI have several times run a workshop at my company to run people through some basics: http://www.boltmade.com/presentations/intro-to-functional-programming
I have also (once) at the local hackerspace run an introduction to computer science, which contains quite a bit of functional. Curriculum: https://github.com/singpolyma/cs-top-and-bottom