Microblog
in reply to @ 2016-074.145ZYes, this is the strength and benefit of the SA clause. If there is someone specific you want to give permission to, you can just give them permission. You are the copyright holder, you can do whatever you want.
However, if you want people to use your work without sharing alike… then why choose SA at all?
in reply to @ 2016-073.924ZI mean, C is better than C++, but if you want to do new stuff you should look at Rust
in reply to @ 2016-073.115ZShould be in your tray. Try installing stalonetray
in reply to @ 2016-072.525ZYou realise software freedom is a social justice movement, yes?
in reply to @ 2016-072.524ZMany of the items on the list are not particularly actionable
in reply to @ 2016-071.842Zlots. Drupal, WordPress, MoinMoin, depends on what your needs are
in reply to @ 2016-071.840Zit's automated. If enough people want it offering multiple qualities could matter, but people mostly seem to want HD even on mobile these days, and the files aren't that big (unless you have all of them)
in reply to @ 2016-071.542ZOne of the many things made possible by the license change/clarification.
If you can help seed, that would be great!
in reply to @ 2016-069.844ZYeah, this statement is specifically for the vlogging channel.
in reply to @ 2016-069.136ZThanks! You guys are awesome 🙂
in reply to @ 2016-068.938ZEmail sent
in reply to @ 2016-068.936ZI'm certainly a big fan of the license change. I'm just curious about the specifics in this case.
in reply to @ 2016-068.789ZNo, I mean that the video metadata says:
Licence Creative Commons Attribution licence (reuse allowed)
in reply to @ 2016-068.558ZWhy do kids at the school have root?
in reply to @ 2016-068.554ZThe individual download links at the bottom of the page are broken.
Also, I think the individual page PDFs should have the license and attribution on a corner. Would make it easier to print and distribute single pages and comply with the license.
in reply to @ 2016-068.106ZAwesome! This is very important.
in reply to @ 2016-068.095ZWhat's the correct forum to submit a question for them there?
in reply to @ 2016-068.095ZIf you look at september, older videos are marked "standard YouTube license"
in reply to @ 2016-067.900Zsources: https://github.com/cheat-engine/cheat-engine — but I don't see a license
in reply to @ 2016-067.517ZI wish the new tab ads thing had worked out. It was a good idea
in reply to @ 2016-067.513ZLXDE
in reply to @ 2016-067.192ZCC doesn't have a license that allows public performance but bans recording.
If you're mostly looking to prevent exploitation by big corporations, CC-BY-SA has a history of being successful in that regard.
in reply to @ 2016-065.568ZWhat would be the perks from such a campaign? If you really can get the views maybe see this an an investment and just go for it yourself?
in reply to @ 2016-065.193Z
read?
in reply to @ 2016-064.565ZI didn't realise stretch was so soon
in reply to @ 2016-064.190ZThe vast majority of v6 installs should never need DHCPv6 because of the ip autoconfigure built into IPv6 that is way more effective