Microblog
in reply to @ 2015-359 14:21 UTC
in reply to @ 2015-358 17:23 UTCAhhhhhh!! I was going to try your suggestion, but wheb I exited kodi I took me back to what looks like some sort of setup wizard. It refuses to even show me the menu until it can check for updates or sign me in or something.. but it refuses to connect to the servers! So basically my ouya is a brick now..
in reply to @ 2015-357 20:22 UTCPersona was always weird. An OpenID knock-off (where OpenID is a SAML knock-off) long after OpenID was already very popular.
in reply to @ 2015-356 17:39 UTCIt's a bit different because their collection is curated whereas Jamendo was uncurated.
They are a non-profit, so that's something going for them.
in reply to @ 2015-355 04:56 UTCUse the Discourse software. they offer hosting or it should be not to hard to get set up on commodity hosting
in reply to @ 2015-354 16:13 UTCIf you're switching away from windows, most distros don't have these issues because the package manager knows about what is installed and can properly remove it.
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:56 UTC
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:53 UTCThey have their goal and current progress in the header of their website
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:51 UTCIs libressl a drop-in replacement?
Yes, though if you're using some of the more baroque features of OpenSSL they're not supported. libressl is definitely the future
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:50 UTCSwitching to GPLv3 would be very difficult for a project like Linux, and Linus doesn't seen an advantage that would justify all that non-coding effort
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:45 UTCThe SFC has a very narrow focus, which is to provide GPL enforcement (for any software licensed under the GPL)
In fact, the SFC is primarily purposed with providing support services for their member projects (https://sfconservancy.org/members/current/) — one of those services is GPL enforcement, but they also have many other important services (such as enabling projects to give tax receipts for donations, etc).
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:44 UTCThe SFC works to support free software projects (https://sfconservancy.org/members/current/) to provide them with all the services they need to accept charitable donations, etc, as well as some others such as enforcement services, etc.
in reply to @ 2015-354 15:41 UTCCurrently they do not even support recurring subscriptions.
in reply to @ 2015-352 20:31 UTCMaybe more free. But Replicant is still Android… I just want to run debian on my devices. No more half-baked "mobile OS"
in reply to @ 2015-352 13:32 UTCWhy is that ideal?
in reply to @ 2015-352 04:18 UTCI don't know how a cc license will end up working out. Obviously it would be in the spirit of the license for you to provide schematics to people who purchase your product, but that may not be strictly required by the license.
in reply to @ 2015-352 03:59 UTCA tablet that is crap to use I could work with. No tablet leaves me where I started.
in reply to @ 2015-352 03:58 UTCSoftware already exists. Maybe some tweaks were needed for larger screen size or no cell radio? But certainly most of the money from a tablet crowdfunding should go to a tablet and not to a company's other pet projects…
in reply to @ 2015-352 03:36 UTCThat's not how copyright works. Your changes are always your own. However, in order to be allowed the use the parts from the original at all you must abide by the terms of the license. In this case, that means your schematics must be BY-SA as well. If you want to work out specific details of how that applies to specific things you want to do I suggest you engage a lawyer who specialises in copyright.
in reply to @ 2015-351 19:58 UTCYou might want to investigate GNU Social or Known.
in reply to @ 2015-351 14:25 UTCanything you build will probably be a higher-cost shallow copy of something awesome that already exists. Hard to make reccos without knowing any requirements, though.
in reply to @ 2015-350 16:32 UTCYeah, I'm not sure why all the GPL hate has come up recently. Some people seem to be developing this idea that GPL use in unethical, and yet those same people have no problem with the "all rights reserved" license…
in reply to @ 2015-350 16:31 UTCimposes restrictions on the commercial users of their software
Untrue. In fact, the free software definition requires that all uses (including commercial) be permitted
in reply to @ 2015-349 20:08 UTCI wish anything this article said were based in reality
in reply to @ 2015-348 15:44 UTCEspecially like this:
When you rip on a project or someone for their choice of license you are being gigantic jerk
in reply to @ 2015-348 15:41 UTCBecause he feels entitled to use the work for whatever he wants, including not allowing others to feel similarly entitled about his work?
in reply to @ 2015-348 15:40 UTCyou can modify the source of something licensed under the GPL and you DO NOT need to provide the source code so long as you do not distribute it or do not publish it somewhere?
That is correct.
in reply to @ 2015-348 13:30 UTCThe rise of all this unsubstantiated GPL hate is interesting to me.
I always have, and for now still do, license most of my code ISC. But I don't think I've ever hated the GPL with the kind of blind rage this and other posts seem to have.
in reply to @ 2015-346 22:03 UTCTouch won't emulate mouse clicks on other apps?
in reply to @ 2015-346 18:41 UTCThis is what the old Gratipay was, too. It's a good model
in reply to @ 2015-345 17:57 UTCOpenShot
in reply to @ 2015-345 03:29 UTCcreate xmpp account anywhere (like blah.im or yax.im) and then make a chatroom on public server (like on chat.yax.im)