Microblog
in reply to @ 2015-356.206ZUse the Discourse software. they offer hosting or it should be not to hard to get set up on commodity hosting
in reply to @ 2015-355.676ZIf you're switching away from windows, most distros don't have these issues because the package manager knows about what is installed and can properly remove it.
in reply to @ 2015-355.664Z
in reply to @ 2015-355.662ZThey have their goal and current progress in the header of their website
in reply to @ 2015-355.661ZIs libressl a drop-in replacement?
Yes, though if you're using some of the more baroque features of OpenSSL they're not supported. libressl is definitely the future
in reply to @ 2015-355.660ZSwitching to GPLv3 would be very difficult for a project like Linux, and Linus doesn't seen an advantage that would justify all that non-coding effort
in reply to @ 2015-355.656ZThe SFC has a very narrow focus, which is to provide GPL enforcement (for any software licensed under the GPL)
In fact, the SFC is primarily purposed with providing support services for their member projects (https://sfconservancy.org/members/current/) — one of those services is GPL enforcement, but they also have many other important services (such as enabling projects to give tax receipts for donations, etc).
in reply to @ 2015-355.656ZThe SFC works to support free software projects (https://sfconservancy.org/members/current/) to provide them with all the services they need to accept charitable donations, etc, as well as some others such as enforcement services, etc.
in reply to @ 2015-355.654ZCurrently they do not even support recurring subscriptions.
in reply to @ 2015-353.855ZMaybe more free. But Replicant is still Android… I just want to run debian on my devices. No more half-baked "mobile OS"
in reply to @ 2015-353.564ZWhy is that ideal?
in reply to @ 2015-353.179ZI don't know how a cc license will end up working out. Obviously it would be in the spirit of the license for you to provide schematics to people who purchase your product, but that may not be strictly required by the license.
in reply to @ 2015-353.166ZA tablet that is crap to use I could work with. No tablet leaves me where I started.
in reply to @ 2015-353.165ZSoftware already exists. Maybe some tweaks were needed for larger screen size or no cell radio? But certainly most of the money from a tablet crowdfunding should go to a tablet and not to a company's other pet projects…
in reply to @ 2015-353.150ZThat's not how copyright works. Your changes are always your own. However, in order to be allowed the use the parts from the original at all you must abide by the terms of the license. In this case, that means your schematics must be BY-SA as well. If you want to work out specific details of how that applies to specific things you want to do I suggest you engage a lawyer who specialises in copyright.
in reply to @ 2015-352.832ZYou might want to investigate GNU Social or Known.
in reply to @ 2015-352.601Zanything you build will probably be a higher-cost shallow copy of something awesome that already exists. Hard to make reccos without knowing any requirements, though.
in reply to @ 2015-351.689ZYeah, I'm not sure why all the GPL hate has come up recently. Some people seem to be developing this idea that GPL use in unethical, and yet those same people have no problem with the "all rights reserved" license…
in reply to @ 2015-351.688Zimposes restrictions on the commercial users of their software
Untrue. In fact, the free software definition requires that all uses (including commercial) be permitted
in reply to @ 2015-350.839ZI wish anything this article said were based in reality
in reply to @ 2015-349.656ZEspecially like this:
When you rip on a project or someone for their choice of license you are being gigantic jerk
in reply to @ 2015-349.654ZBecause he feels entitled to use the work for whatever he wants, including not allowing others to feel similarly entitled about his work?
in reply to @ 2015-349.653Zyou can modify the source of something licensed under the GPL and you DO NOT need to provide the source code so long as you do not distribute it or do not publish it somewhere?
That is correct.
in reply to @ 2015-349.563ZThe rise of all this unsubstantiated GPL hate is interesting to me.
I always have, and for now still do, license most of my code ISC. But I don't think I've ever hated the GPL with the kind of blind rage this and other posts seem to have.
in reply to @ 2015-347.919ZTouch won't emulate mouse clicks on other apps?
in reply to @ 2015-347.779ZThis is what the old Gratipay was, too. It's a good model
in reply to @ 2015-346.748ZOpenShot
in reply to @ 2015-346.145Zcreate xmpp account anywhere (like blah.im or yax.im) and then make a chatroom on public server (like on chat.yax.im)
in reply to @ 2015-345.842ZIt is my understanding that if you build a kernel without this firmware (such as linux-libre) you should be fine on that front.
in reply to @ 2015-345.553Z"free as in speech" doesn't mean no charge but rather "free as in freedom" as in libre as in liberty.
in reply to @ 2015-345.549ZIf you get the version with wifi/bluetooth they require blobs. The FSF talks about iMX.6 on a different page I think and how the video codec coprocessor requires a blob, but you don't need to use that. It's the same SoC as Novena.
in reply to @ 2015-345.164ZHummingboard — free GPU drivers are getting more usable all the time.
in reply to @ 2015-344.659ZI am going to go through and comment on the ones that are not theirs directing people to the official release
That is the best solution
in reply to @ 2015-344.555ZThey can't really prevent it from happening — even if they had "all rights reserved" that only gives them the legal right to have it take down and/or sue. You can never fully prevent it.
As it is, their best bet is probably to post their own music for sale themselves, and use their brand and fanbase to make their official postings the most popular ones. The people posting their music are doing nothing wrong, and especially if the band is not listed on that platform yet are doing a service exactly in the spirit of the license.
in reply to @ 2015-344.081ZI have an X60 running libreboot. One of the best machines I ever had (except the battery life)