Microblog
in reply to @ 2015-333.174ZSince OSX and Windows both get less usable with every release, they may be solving this for us π
in reply to @ 2015-333.172ZCut to the root and Debian π
in reply to @ 2015-333.167Zthere is also gratipay, but if you're looking for a single aggregator of every good cause, you won't find one.
in reply to @ 2015-333.160ZPeople seem more aware than they used to be, but of course still usually unaware.
in reply to @ 2015-332.590ZAs long as your types implement
Typeable
and you're ok constraining to that, you can.But any solution that uses
Typeable
is the wrong solution.
in reply to @ 2015-332.585Z
in reply to @ 2015-332.187ZOn Android Conversations is the ultimate app
in reply to @ 2015-332.174ZIn the web world, there's this "feature detection" idea instead of versioning
in reply to @ 2015-331.208ZPretty sure the only "new" on is the Priv
in reply to @ 2015-331.207ZSince VMware is an LF member, it seems pretty clear.
No one wants to say anything official of course, but friends of mine who should know aren't saying no…
in reply to @ 2015-331.204ZMaybe. This seems pretty unnecessary, but is certainly gaining popularity as a model.
in reply to @ 2015-331.165ZRandom programs running as you knowing everything about other programs running as you is obviously a security risk
s/a security risk/the whole point of having them run as "you"
in reply to @ 2015-329.592ZWhat's the question?
in reply to @ 2015-328.568ZThey could, and they do. You can even make and distribute binaries for free. But if you make the easiest/most obvious way to get something to pay, most people will.
It turns out that laws don't prevent you from being able to get most proprietary software gratis. But people still don't, because buying is easier.
in reply to @ 2015-327.869ZYou can charge people without all the proprietary relicensing hoopla. If you make it more convenient to pay than to not pay, people usually will.
in reply to @ 2015-325.144ZThis is the model companies like withknown.com use
in reply to @ 2015-325.140ZWell, basically the way it works is that you charge people to use the service. Then you offer to anyone who is a user access to the source code under a free license.
in reply to @ 2015-324.699ZI would simply charge people for using the service if they felt it will be useful to them
This model is still perfectly acceptable for freedom-respecting software
in reply to @ 2015-324.576Zi.MX6 systems like the Hummingboard aren't even listed